检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾博颖 周双[2] 张晓琳[3] 周颖[1,2] 崔一民[1,2] JIA Bo-ying;ZHOU Shuang;ZHANG Xiao-lin;ZHOU Ying;CUI Yi-min(Department of Pharmaceutical Administration and Clinical Pharmacy,School of Pharmaceutical Science,Peking University,Beijing 100191,China;a.Department of Pharmacy,Peking University First Hospital,Beijing 100034,China;Department of Geriatrics,Peking University First Hospital,Beijing 100034,China;Department of Pharmacy,The First Hospital of Tsinghua University,Beijing 100016,China)
机构地区:[1]北京大学药学院药事管理与临床药学系,北京100191 [2]北京大学第一医院药剂科,北京100034 [3]北京大学第一医院老年内科,北京100034 [4]清华大学第一附属医院药学部,北京100016
出 处:《中国临床药理学杂志》2019年第21期2768-2772,共5页The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
摘 要:目的评价处方精简在老年患者中的可行性与安全性Meta分析。方法用Cochrane系统评价方法,检索Cochrane Library、PubMed、MedLine等数据库,根据干预措施的不同分为试验组(进行处方精简评估及干预并随访)和对照组(常规随访)。以死亡率和跌倒评价处方精简的可行性,以住院率、再入院率、药物不良反应和不良事件评价安全性。结果共纳入23篇文献研究,质量为高、中、低者分别有2,15和6篇,患者共10514例。Meta分析结果显示:处方精简未能改变死亡率(P>0.05);亚组分析:当患者人群特定(如患者认知功能正常)或由医务人员主导的处方精简时,死亡率显著降低(均P<0.05)。处方精简可以降低住院率、再入院率、药物不良反应和不良事件发生率(P<0.05或P<0.01)。结论处方精简未改变死亡率,但安全性良好,以医务人员主导的处方精简和针对认知功能正常患者的死亡率显著降低。Objective To evaluate the feasibility and effect of deprescribing in older adults systematically.Methods The Cochrane review’s method was adopted and computer-based retrieval was performed on Cochrane Library,Pub Med,Med Line and other database.According to the different interventions,they were divided into experimental group(prescription streamlined evaluation and intervention and followed up)and control group(routine follow-up).The feasibility of simplified prescriptions was evaluated by mortality and falls,and the safety was evaluated by hospitalization rate,readmission rate,adverse drug reactions and adverse events.Results A total of 23 papers met the inclusion criteria,their quality evaluation results were 2 high,15 medium and 6 low,which included 10514 patients.Meta-analysis showed that prescription reduction did not change mortality(P>0.05);subgroup analysis showed that mortality significantly decreased when patients were specific(such as patients with normal cognitive function)or prescription reduction led by medical staff(all P<0.05).Deprescribing can reduce the incidence of admissions/readmission and adverse reactions/adverse events(P<0.05 or P<0.01).Conclusion Although deprescribing does not reduce mortality,it is safe.Mortality significantly reduces when applying patient-specific interventions or participants living with cognitively intact.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112