检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁柳 Yuan Liu(College of Economics,Jinan University,Guangzhou 510632,China)
机构地区:[1]暨南大学经济学院
出 处:《经济与管理》2019年第6期86-92,共7页Economy and Management
摘 要:基于中国上市企业2006-2015年对外直接投资的数据,分别从管制距离、规范距离和认知距离三个维度探究制度距离与企业对外直接投资进入模式选择的关系。研究发现:随着管制距离、规范距离和认知距离的增加,相对于绿地新建,跨国企业更倾向于选择跨国并购的进入模式。同时,检验东道国政府的态度对制度距离影响海外市场进入模式的选择发现,东道国政府的态度对认知距离影响进入模式的选择具有调节作用。即随着认知距离的增加,东道国政府对FDI的态度越友好,OFDI企业选择跨国并购进入模式的可能性越小;而东道国政府的态度对管制距离和规范距离影响海外市场进入模式选择的调节作用不显著。Based on the data of Chinese listed enterprises’ OFDI from 2006 to 2015, this paper explores the relationship between institutional distance and the choice of OFDI entry mode from three dimensions of regulatory distance, normative distance and cognitive distance. It is found that with the increase of regulatory distance, normative distance and cognitive distance,compared with Greenfield new construction,transnational enterprises are more inclined to choose the entry mode of transnational M&A. At the same time, this paper examines the host government’s attitude towards the choice of the entry mode of overseas market influenced by institutional distance, and finds that the attitude of the host government has a moderating effect on the choice of entry mode affected by cognitive distance. In other words,with the increase of cognitive distance,the more friendly attitude of host government towards FDI,the less likely OFDI enterprises are to choose the mode of transnational M&A. However, the attitude of the host government has no significant moderating effect on the choice of entry mode of overseas market affected by regulatory distance and normative distance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.195.228