论法定犯的不成文构成要件要素  

A New Promotion of the Theory about Constitutive Elements of Crime Establishment of Unwritten Elements of Statutory Crime

作　　者：刘艳红[1] 

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院

出　　处：《中外法学》2019年第5期1151-1171,共21页Peking University Law Journal

基　　金：国家社科基金重大招标课题“大数据与审判体系和审判能力现代化研究”(项目批准号：17ZDA131)阶段性成果;江苏高校“青蓝工程”资助成果

摘　　要：法定犯的刑法条文设置“违反国家规定”这一要素有直接规定、间接规定与没有规定三种模式.其中,对于没有规定这种模式,可否如同前两种模式那样援引相关国家规定并据之判断行为的违法性尚需研究.基于法定犯行政违法与刑事违法的双重特性,从法秩序统一性原理、法定犯的内部结构和处罚范围以及司法实务出发分析,刑法条文中未规定的“违反国家规定”是法定犯的不成文的构成要件要素.深入探讨法定犯的不成文构成要件要素,有助于寻找法定犯的违法性判断的前置法,理解法定犯单纯不服从(而非侵害法益)的违法性实质,对于化解法定犯口袋化的困境,推动构成要件理论的精细化发展具有重要意义.There are modes of“violation of state provision”in criminal law of mala prohibita,that is direct provision,indirect provision and no provision.In the absence of no provision model,there are two distinct ways of invoking and not invoking relevant state provisions in judicial adjudication.Based on the dual characteristics of administrative and criminal offences committed by mala prohibita,It can be said that the“violation of state provision”of mala prohibita is a prerequisite for judging criminal illegality from the perspective of the principle of unity of legal order,the internal structure of mala prohibita,the punishment scope of mala prohibita and the judicial practice of mala prohibita.It is of great significance to apply and recognize“violation of state provision”as an unwritten tatbestand,which is s helpful to understand the essence of the illegality of mala prohibita and prevent mala prohibita to be pocket crimes.So,taking“violation of state provision”as an unwritten tatbestand of mala prohibita enriches the content of unwritten tatbestand,and revitalizes the tatbestand theory in the field of mala prohibita.

关 键 词：法定犯 违反国家规定 不成文的构成要件要素 双重违法性 构成要件理论 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]