行政复议“双被告”制度的困境与变革  

The Dilemma and Reform of “Double Defendant” System in Administrative Reconsideration

作　　者：曹鎏 冯健 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学法治政府研究院 [2]中国政法大学法学院

出　　处：《中外法学》2019年第5期1217-1233,共17页Peking University Law Journal

摘　　要：行政复议“双被告”制度运行已四年有余.国家层面与地方层面实践数据所呈现出的趋势不完全一致.“双被告”制度的提出使复议机关定位“自相矛盾”,程序上空转严重,也背离了理性“经济人”原则.这不仅不符合“成本—收益分析”的基本要求,也很大程度上减损了复议制度本身的权威性.这种末端解决问题的方式无法在源头上解决我国复议体制机制面临的困境,相反已经产生一系列新的问题.我国行政复议的改革应当着眼于复议自身,从体制、机制和制度层面保障其发挥出天然优势,促进复议与诉讼的互补互洽,真正把行政复议打造成化解行政争议的主渠道.The administrative reconsideration of the "double accused"system has been in operation for more than three years.Inconsistent trends in practice data at the national and local levels are highlighted.The "double accused" system made the reconsideration agency position“self-contradictory”,procedurally idling.and also deviated from the rational“economic man”principle,which not only did not meet the basic requirements of“cost-benefit”,but also largely Derogation of the authority of the reconsideration system.This kind of terminal solution to the problem cannot solve the dilemma of China's reconsideration system at the source.On the contrary,a series of new problems have ariseh.The reform of China's administrative reconsideration should focus on reconsideration itself,guarantee its natural advantages from the system,mechanism and system level,promote the complementarity and mutual agreement between reconsideration and litigation,and truly make administrative reconsideration the main channel for resol-ving administrative disputes.

关 键 词：行政复议 “双被告”制度 准司法性 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]