检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张颖[1] Zhang Ying(Shandong University of Finance and Economics,Shandong Jinan 250000 China)
机构地区:[1]山东财经大学,山东济南250000
出 处:《西部公安论坛》2019年第3期14-21,共8页Journal of Western Public Security
摘 要:审判权运行机制改革,是我国司法改革的重点。作为本土化的审判委员会,它在法院运行中拥有事实上的最高审判权,发挥着总结审判经验,加强审判民主和审判监督等重要职能,而其存废也成为司法现代化的一个重要衡量标准和司法改革背景下的一个出路。本文从利弊双重角度考虑审判委员会制度存在的价值和异化,并提出了对相关制度的改良。The reform of the operational mechanism of judicial power is the focus of this judicial reform in China.As a localized trial committee,it has the de facto supreme jurisdiction in the operation of the court,plays a summary of trial experience,strengthens important functions such as trial democracy and trial supervision,and its abolition has become an important measure of judicial modernization.A way out in the context of judicial reform.This paper considers the value and alienation of the judicial committee system from the perspective of both advantages and disadvantages,and proposes the improvement of related systems.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7