检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李海波[1,2] 仇保兴 LI Hai-bo;QIU Bao-xing
机构地区:[1]长沙学院院 [2]首都经济贸易大学城市经济与公共管理学院 [3]中国城市科学研究会
出 处:《城市问题》2019年第11期20-29,共10页Urban Problems
基 金:湖南省社会科学成果评审委员会项目(XSP19YBZ069)
摘 要:基于全国调查数据,引入迁移福利作为中介变量,运用最优尺度回归和中介效应法,分析了城市级别对农民工市民化倾向的影响作用与机制。结果显示:农民工市民化倾向与城市级别呈现倒U型关系;在县城与县级市务工的农民工的定居意愿最强,其次是地级市和省会城市,在直辖市务工的农民工的定居意愿最弱,建制镇次之;城市级别主要通过收入水平、居住福利、社交福利和心理福利影响农民工的市民化倾向;就业福利和居住成本的中介效应则不显著。Based on the national survey data,the Optimal Scale Regression and the Intermediary Effect Method are used to empirically analyze the influence and mechanism of urban level on migrant workers’ citizenization tendency. The results show that: There is an inverted U-shaped relationship between migrant workers’ citizenization tendency and urban level;Migrant workers in county and county-level cities have the strongest willingness to settle down,followed by prefecture-level cities and provincial capitals,and migrant workers in municipalities directly under the Central Government have the weakest willingness to settle down,followed by structured towns;At the city level,the following elements mainly affects migrant workers’ citizenization tendency: the income level,residential welfare,social welfare and psychological welfare;The intermediary effect of employment welfare and housing cost is not significant.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.82