检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁黎薇[1] 朱晓涛 袁兆毓 DING Liwei;ZHU Xiaotao;YUAN Zhaoyu(The Jiamusi Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Jiamusi 154002 Heilongjiang,China)
机构地区:[1]佳木斯市中医院
出 处:《中国民康医学》2019年第18期105-107,共3页Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
摘 要:目的:观察采用火针扬刺法治疗带状疱疹血瘀型神经痛的临床效果。方法:选取带状疱疹血瘀型神经痛的患者80例,采用随机数字表法将患者分为对照组和观察组各40例,对照组采用毫针针刺进行治疗,观察组采用火针扬刺法进行治疗,对比两组患者的临床治疗效果。结果:观察组治疗总有效率为92.5%,高于对照组的82.5%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组的疼痛视觉模拟(VAS)评分、睡眠质量评分、止痛即刻起效时间明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:采用火针扬刺法治疗带状疱疹血瘀型神经痛的效果优于毫针针刺治疗,可有效缓解患者的疼痛。Objective: To study effects of fire needle with Yangci method on blood stasis type post-herpetic neuralgia. Methods: 80 patients with blood stasis type post-herpetic neuralgia were selected and divided into two groups by using the random number table method. The control group(n=40) was given filiform needle manipulation, while the observation group(n=40) used the fire needle with Yangci method. The clinical effects of the two groups were compared. Results: The total effective rate of the observation group was 92.5%, which was higher than 82.5% of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The VAS score, sleep quality score, and analgesic effect time of the observation group were significantly better than those of the control group(P<0.05). Conclusions: Fire needle with Yangci method is superior to filiform needle manipulation in the treatment of blood stasis type post-herpetic neuralgia. It can effective relieve the pain of these patients.
关 键 词:带状疱疹神经后遗痛 血瘀型 火针扬刺法 毫针针刺
分 类 号:R246.7[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147