董事对公司债权人责任的实证考察与制度重塑  

Empirical Analysis and System Reconstruction of the directors’ liability to corporate creditor

作　　者：邓辉[1] 姚瑶[2,3] Deng Hui;Yao Yao

机构地区：[1]江西财经大学法学院 [2]江西财经大学博士后流动站 [3]江西南昌工程学院

出　　处：《中国应用法学》2019年第6期12-22,共11页China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence

基　　金：中国法学会2018年度部级法学研究课题（CLS2018D80）的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：现有法律规则将“董事对公司债权人责任”仅限定于未依法履行清算义务和监督资本真实义务两类情形下的七种具体事由。在有限的诉讼依据下,公司债权人起诉董事的案例在我国司法实践中也十分有限。董事损害公司债权人利益的情形既包括以消极作为表现的逃避(怠于履行)义务行为,也包括以积极作为表现的不当交易行为,其实质皆在于不当减损公司清偿能力。我国应以状态(公司事实破产)和行为(董事不当减损公司清偿能力的行为)共同作为公司债权人向董事追究个人责任的适用条件。The board member's liability to corporate creditor is restricted to seven specific situations by Chinese legal rules,which can be classified as two categories:fail to perform the liquidation obligations and fail to supervise thecapital reality.The applications of rules forthe litigation cases of the corporate creditors suing the board members are limited.The situation which the board members harm the interests of corporate creditors in both evasive statutory duties and wrongful trading.The essence of these situations could be summarized as improper derogation from the company's solvency.As for an applicable criterion for the board members'liability to corporate creditor,it should jointly use not only the state which a company is in factual bankruptcy,but also the board members'behaviors for improperly reducing the company's solvency.

关 键 词：董事对公司债权人责任 不当交易行为 事实破产 

分 类 号：D[政治法律]