超越“合并”:农村基本建制单位重组的“第三条道路”——以美国、法国、澳大利亚为研究对象  

Beyond “Merger”: The “Third Way” to Reorganize Basic Rural Units——Taking the United States, France, and Australia as Research Objects

作　　者：邓大才[1,2] 郭瑞敏 DENG Da-cai;GUO Rui-min(Institute for Advanced Study and Political Science;China Institute for Rural Studies,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China)

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学政治科学高等研究院,武汉430079 [2]华中师范大学中国农村研究院,武汉430079

出　　处：《学习与探索》2019年第11期40-46,195,共8页Study & Exploration

基　　金：国家社会科学基金十九大重大专项“构建乡村治理新体系研究”(18VSJ063)

摘　　要：为了应对工业化、城市化发展对公共服务的规模化需求,美国、法国和澳大利亚没有对农村基本建制单位进行简单的兼并和合并,而是以功能为目标,进行功能性或者机构性重组。美国通过横向、纵向合作,实施功能与机构重组;法国通过横向联合,实施机构性重组;澳大利亚则是超越地域,设置虚拟市政理事会,实施功能性重组。三个国家都以功能为核心重组功能和机构,或者两者同时重组,并以此超越基本建制单位简单的兼并和合并,从而走出了一条基本建制单位调整的“第三条道路”。To cope with the large-scale demand for public services in the development of industrialization and urbanization,the United States,France,and Australia did not perform simple mergers and acquisitions of rural basic units,but instead aimed at functions and carried out functional or institutional reorganization.The United States adopts horizontal and vertical mergers to conduct functional and institutional reorganizations.France implements institutional reorganization through horizontal integration.Australia goes beyond the geographical region to set up a virtual municipal council to implement a functional reorganization.All three countries reorganize functions and institutions with functions at the core,or reorganize both at the same time,so as to go beyond simple mergers and acquisitions and make a“third way”for the adjustment of basic organizational units.

关 键 词：乡村治理 农村基本建制单位 功能重组 机构重组 “第三条道路” 

分 类 号：D422.6[政治法律—政治学]