全球视阈中的缺席审判研究  

Global Perspective on Trial in Absentia

作　　者：裴显鼎[1] 王秀梅 PEI Xian-ding;WANG Xiu-mei

机构地区：[1]最高人民法院审判委员会 [2]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875

出　　处：《吉林大学社会科学学报》2019年第6期59-72,220,共15页Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(17ZDA137)

摘　　要：自历史上第一例缺席审判实践肇始,关于缺席审判的合法性问题在各国立法上的肯定与否定就始终在争议中博弈前行。然而,随着近年来跨国犯罪的增长,不同国家和地区对缺席审判的启用对全球有效打击犯罪提出了一些新的课题。腐败与经济犯罪嫌疑人的出逃和资产转移以及对外国恐怖主义战斗员属地和属人管辖的障碍,再次引发法学界及社会各界对缺席审判的关注。缺席审判的立法发展与相关国家的司法实践,也暴露出作为缺席审判症结的送达等问题,这些问题都有待进一步的深入研究。在保障程序正义和适用补救措施的基础上同时借鉴其他国家适用的经验,恰当适用缺席审判应成为我国司法实践中的新尝试。The legality of the trial in absentia and the affirmation and denial legislation on the trial in absentia have always been in the game since the first trial in absentia in the history.However,with the increasing transnational crime in recent years,different countries and regions try to conduct trials in absentia again,which puts forward several issues for fighting against transnational crimes effectively in the world.Suspect of corruption and economic crimes who flee and transfer the assets to another country,and obstacles of the territorial and personal jurisdiction over foreign terrorist fighters,have once again aroused the attention of the scholars and the community on trial in absentia.The development of legislation and practice on trial in absentia in some countries also expose the key problems of service of trial in absentia,which need to be further studied.It will be a new judicial practice that trial in absentia will be properly applied in China under the protection of due process and application of judicial remedy,and taking the good practice as reference from other countries.

关 键 词：缺席审判 国际引渡 国际刑事审判 司法救济 跨国犯罪 

分 类 号：C[社会学]