三种应用虚拟化方案用于医院信息系统的对比  

Comparison of Three Application Virtualization Methods for Hospital Information System

作　　者：陈华 黄希晖 陈国英 CHEN Hua;HUANG Xihui;CHEN Guoying(Mindong Hospital of Ningde City,Ningde,China,355000)

机构地区：[1]宁德市闽东医院信息科

出　　处：《福建电脑》2019年第11期35-38,共4页Journal of Fujian Computer

摘　　要：应用虚拟化技术能解决日益加重的医院信息系统的负荷,减少医院的运行成本,有效提高资源的利用率,同时还适当地简化了对客户端的维护方法,可以为医院带来众多益处。市面上许多公司拥有成熟的应用虚拟化技术,但其部署按终端个数收费,成本较高,因此医院可考虑自己搭建应用虚拟化平台。本文简要介绍ThinApp、XenApp、RemoteApp这三种应用虚拟化方案,并在医院系统HIS和EMR上进行测试;通过在各方面对比三种方案,综合考虑RemoteApp为最优的应用虚拟化方案。The technology of application virtualization can solve the increasing load of hospital information system and reduce the operating cost of the hospital. At the same time, it also properly simplifies the maintenance methods for the client. So the technology of application virtualization can bring a lot of benefits to the hospital. Many companies have some mature solutions. Their solutions are charged by terminal number and the cost is high. So the hospitals can consider building their own application virtualization platform. This paper briefly introduces three application virtualization methods, including ThinApp, XenApp and RemoteApp. The three methods were tested on HIS and EMR. By comparing the three methods in all aspects, we consider RemoteApp as the best application virtualization method.

关 键 词：应用虚拟化 医院信息系统 ThinApp XENAPP RemoteApp 

分 类 号：TP319[自动化与计算机技术—计算机软件与理论]