宫颈特殊染色法在宫颈疾病筛查中的运用  

Application of cervical special staining in cervical lesion screening

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:尹玲 秦小棠 Yin Ling;Qin Xiaotang(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Chengdu No.11 People's Hospital,Chengdu,Sichuan 610000,China)

机构地区:[1]成都市第十一人民医院妇产科,四川成都610000

出  处:《医药前沿》2019年第32期36-37,共2页Journal of Frontiers of Medicine

摘  要:目的:探讨宫颈特殊染色法在宫颈疾病筛查中的运用.方法:选择2017年1月—2018年12月在我科门诊行宫颈疾病筛查的患者220例,同时采用宫颈特殊染色检查及宫颈液基细胞学检查,将两种筛查结果进行对比,评估宫颈特殊染色法结果与液基细胞学检查结果是否存在差异.结果:宫颈特殊染色法阴性检测率(93.2%)与宫颈液基细胞学检测阴性检测率(95.9%)相比一致性较好(Kappa=0.649,P<0.05)且差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:宫颈特殊染色法与宫颈液基细胞学检查在宫颈疾病筛查中无显著差异,且宫颈特殊染色法操作简单,结果快速,可常规用于宫颈疾病初步筛查.Objective To explore the application of cervical special staining(FRD)in cervical lesions screening.Methods From January 2017 to December 2018,220 cases of cervical lesions screening were examined both by FRD and liquid based cervical cytology(TCT)in our outpatient department.To compare and evaluate whether there was any difference between the results of FRD and TCT.Results The negative rate of FRD(93.2%)was better than that of TCT(95.9%)(Kappa=0.649,P<0.05),and the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion There was no statistically significant difference between FRD and TCT,and the FRD is faster and easier,which is worthy in the preliminary screening of cervical lesions.

关 键 词:宫颈特殊染色法 宫颈液基细胞学检查 宫颈疾病 筛查 

分 类 号:R711[医药卫生—妇产科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象