检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨成斌 孙胜祥 魏华 Yang Chengbin;Sun Shengxiang;Wei Hua(Naval University of Engineering,Wuhan 430033,China)
机构地区:[1]海军工程大学管理工程与装备经济系
出 处:《科技管理研究》2019年第21期167-171,共5页Science and Technology Management Research
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“军民融合发展战略下民技军用定价机制研究”(18BGL287)
摘 要:大型武器装备的复杂性和技术密集性,使得装备承制企业难以依靠自身力量解决全部技术问题,在研制、生产等装备采购阶段中积极吸收并转化应用外部优质技术成果,实现军工领域内乃至军民领域间的技术融合,是提高武器装备采购效率的必由之路。针对单一来源采购中军工企业使用非本单位所有的知识产权时缺少合理定价方法现状,提出基于军方、军工企业和知识产权人三方共赢思想,针对成本节约型技术的知识产权使用费定价方法;案例分析结果表明,该方法具有参数明确、可操作性强的特点,且有利于实现三方共赢。The complexity and the technology-intensive nature of large-scale weapon and equipment make it difficult for the equipment-bearing enterprises to solve the whole technical problems by themselves, and actively absorb and convert the high-quality technical achievements in the equipment procurement stage such as development, production and the like, it is the only way to improve the procurement efficiency of weapon and equipment. In view of the lack of reasonable pricing method when military enterprises use intellectual property rights not owned by their own units in single source procurement, this paper puts forward a pricing method of intellectual property royalties based on the tripartite win-win idea of military, military enterprises and intellectual property people, aiming at cost-saving technology. The results of case analysis show that this method has the characteristics of clear parameters and strong maneuverability, and is conducive to the realization of tripartite win-win situation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.22.41.47