历史终结论及其反思  

The End of History and Reflection

作　　者：黄家裕 HUANG Jia-yu(School of Marxism,Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua,Zhejiang 321004)

机构地区：[1]浙江师范大学马克思主义学院

出　　处：《玉林师范学院学报》2019年第4期116-122,共7页Journal of Yulin Normal University

基　　金：国家社科基金项目（编号：12BKS059）

摘　　要：福山继承康德和黑格尔关于历史方向性的思想,阐述历史发展走向资本主义社会;其次,他认为科学技术的发展必然促使人类社会走向一个普遍同质的社会;再次,他从唯心主义立场假定人类"第一"欲望是荣誉,为荣誉而战的欲望促使人类社会也必然终结于"自由"、"民主"的西方资本主义。整个辩护以黑格尔的主奴辩证关系模式论证科技发展机制和人类欲望机制将推进人类历史终结于西方资本主义社会。实际上,福山只是延续了黑格尔的唯心历史观,并且误解了马克思的历史观,为西方文化帝国主义的侵略奠定形而上学的理由而已。Fukuyama inherits Kant’s and Hegel’s Thoughts on the direction of history and expounds that the development of history will move towards a capitalist society;secondly, he believes that the development of science and technology will inevitably promote the human society to a society of universal homogeneity;thirdly, he assumes that the human "first" desire is honor from the idealist position, and the desire to fight for honor will inevitably bring the human society to an end" Western capitalism of freedom and democracy. The whole defense demonstrates that the development mechanism of science and technology and the mechanism of human desire will promote the end of human history in western capitalist society by Hegel’s dialectical relationship between the master and slave. In fact, Fukuyama only continued Hegel’s idealistic view of history, misunderstood Marx’s view of history, and laid a metaphysical reason for the invasion of Western cultural imperialism.

关 键 词：历史终结论 辩护策略 

分 类 号：B15[哲学宗教—世界哲学]