密语世界里的创伤叙事——严歌苓作品《密语者》分析  

Trauma Narration in the Secret World——Analyses of Yan Geling’s The Whisperer

作　　者：王志红 常旭青 WANG Zhihong;CHANG Xuqing(Department of Foreign Language,Taiyuan Institute of Technology,Taiyuan 030008,China;Organization Department,North University of China,Taiyuan 030051,China)

机构地区：[1]太原工业学院外语系,山西太原030008 [2]中北大学组织部,山西太原030051

出　　处：《中北大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第1期97-101,105,共6页Journal of North University of China：Social Science Edition

基　　金：太原工业学院一般科学基金项目：哥特叙事视角下的美国女性华裔文学研究(2018RW03)

摘　　要：创伤是一个现代性话题。严歌苓的中篇小说《密语者》采用密语叙事和现实叙事交替进行的叙事策略,再现了创伤性事件和创伤主体的创伤后反应。密语叙事和现实叙事交替进行的叙事策略一方面为创伤主体找到了恰切的言说与倾诉的语言和途径,另一方面实现了创伤世界与现实世界的沟通与对话。但严歌苓显然对弗洛伊德的必然性因果链条心存质疑,因此创伤一旦得以完整呈现,她便果断结束了这场创伤叙事,为创伤主体留了一个开放性结局。这一叙事风格体现了创伤的偶然性与断裂性特征,与当前社会形态多样化亦相吻合。Trauma is a modern topic.Yan Geling’s novella,The Whisperer,alternated between the secret narration and the real narration to reproduce the traumatic event and the post-traumatic reaction of the trauma individuals.On the one hand,the narrative strategy found the appropriate language and way for the trauma individuals to speak out;on the other hand,it realized the communication between the traumatic world and the real world.However,Yan Gelling obviously questioned Freud’s causal chain,so once the trauma was fully presented,she ended the trauma narration decisively,leaving an open ending for the trauma individuals.This narrative style reflects the accidental and fractured characteristics of trauma,which is also consistent with the diversity of current social forms.

关 键 词：创伤叙事 密语世界 现实世界 严歌苓 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]