检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:石俭平 Shi Jianping
机构地区:[1]上海政法学院国际法学院
出 处:《电子知识产权》2019年第11期52-63,共12页Electronics Intellectual Property
摘 要:我国《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第50条作为调整涉外知识产权侵权关系最重要的国际私法规则,在冲突规范的立法方面吸纳了当前国际立法或文件中较为先进的经验,包括引入“被请求保护地”、“当事人意思自治”等规则。然而在我国的审判实践中对于该法条的理解和适用存在较多的问题,包括法律选择说理不充分、错误理解连结点的含义、几乎无一例外适用了中国法等问题。未来在立法和审判实践中应当进一步厘清第50条的范围以及“被请求保护地”的含义,放宽对“意思自治原则”的限制,填补网络侵犯知识产权法律适用规则的空白。As the most important conflict rule of regulating foreign-related IP infringement relationship,Article 50 of The Law of the Application of Law for Foreign-related Civil Relations has incorporated relatively advanced experiences of international legislations and documents,including Lex Loci Protectionis,Parties’Autonomy etc.However,more problems arise concerning the comprehension as well as application of Article 50 in trial practice,including inadequacy in reasoning,mistakes in comprehending the point of contact,applying Chinese IP laws without exception etc.Hence,the attribution of Article 50 and meaning of Lex Loci Protectionis shall be clarified.Limitations of Parties’Autonomy shall be relaxed and blank on regulating internet IP infringement shall be fi lled in the legislation and trial in the near future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28