《反不正当竞争法》修改后商业秘密司法审判调研报告  

A Research Report on Judicial Adjudications of Trade Secrets Cases after the Amendment of Anti-Unfair Competition Law

作　　者：北京市高级人民法院知识产权庭课题组 Intellectual Property Research Group of Beijing High People’s Court

机构地区：[1]不详

出　　处：《电子知识产权》2019年第11期65-85,共21页Electronics Intellectual Property

摘　　要：商业秘密案件在知识产权审判中具有其独特的判断思路和司法判断规则。商业秘密本身是否成立即商业秘密案件的重点和难点问题,商业秘密认定标准及权利范围的确定、“不为公众所知悉”的举证责任分配等问题始终存在争议。在侵犯商业秘密行为判定中,“员工”“前员工”能否视为“经营者”承担侵权责任、被告使用信息与原告的商业秘密是否相同或构成实质相同以及该信息是否具有合法来源等问题亦存在不同观点。2019年4月23日施行的《中华人民共和国反不正当竞争法》对于侵犯商业秘密的主体、行为类型、举证责任分配以及损害赔偿等方面均作出了修订,从立法层面上加强了对商业秘密权利人的保护。但与此同时,新法之下法院的自由裁量空间也更大,如何正确理解和适用新法,仍需在具体案件中进一步研究分析。Different from other intellectual property cases,the rules and ways of thinking in trials of trade secret cases are quite unique.The existence of trade secrets has always been the key and difficult issue.Furthermore,disputes over the identification standard of trade secret,the determination of the scope of rights,and the distribution of burden of proof on‘not known to the public’has never stopped.There are also different opinions on whether‘staff’or‘former staff’could be regarded as‘manager’and take the liability of tort,whether the information used by the defendant is same or essentially same to the trade secret of the plaintiff,and whether that information has legitimate sources.The Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China had come into force on April 23,2019.Some provisions on the subject of infringing trade secret,types of behaviors,the distribution of burden of proof,and compensation for damages have been revised.And the protection on owners on trade secrets have been strengthened by legislature.Meanwhile,the new law leaves huge discretionary space to courts.Therefore,further studies on understanding and application the new law are needed,especially in trade secret cases.

关 键 词：商业秘密构成要件 举证责任分配 抗辩事由认定 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]