剑桥学派政治思想史:西方传统的阐释与颠覆  

The Cambridge School of Political Thoughts: Interpretation and Subversion of Western Tradition

作　　者：胡传胜[1] HU Chuan-sheng(Jiangsu Provincial Academy of Social Sciences,Nanjing 210004,China)

机构地区：[1]江苏省社会科学院

出　　处：《江苏行政学院学报》2019年第6期80-86,共7页The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“20世纪英美女性主义思潮及其时尚表达研究”(19BSS006)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：剑桥政治思想史学派从历史的角度阐释西方共和主义思想,成为与自由主义、社群主义并列的第三种思潮。在剑桥学派政治思想史著述中,波考克对共和主义思想传统的再发现,斯金纳对无支配自由概念的阐释,都关注于西方传统的中心论题并把西方传统与现代传统相等同;邓恩把思想史的研究方向引向西方传统的边缘;而塔利则将现代西方传统视为诸种地方知识之一,认为西方传统普遍化是近五百年帝国主义寻求支配世界的结果,只有通过"再地方化"策略,才能达到对西方式现代性的解构与颠覆。As one of three trends of political thought juxtaposed with liberalism and communitarianism, the Cambridge school of history of political thought cast highlights on interpretations of Western republicanism. Among the various works of the School, Pocock rediscovered the Republican tradition;Skinner interpreted the concept of non-dominant freedom focusing on the central theme of Western tradition and equating Western tradition with modern tradition;Dunn led the research direction of the history of thought to the edge of Western tradition;Tully regarded the modern western tradition as one of the various local knowledge, believing that the universalization of the Western tradition is the result of imperialism seeking to dominate the world in the past 500 years, and that only through the strategy of "re-localization", can we achieve the deconstruction and subversion of the western modernity.

关 键 词：剑桥学派 波考克 斯金纳 邓恩 塔利 

分 类 号：D091[政治法律—政治学]