检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:严波[1] Yan Bo
机构地区:[1]中央电视台版权和法律事务室
出 处:《苏州大学学报(法学版)》2019年第4期30-41,共12页Journal of Soochow University:Law Edition
摘 要:体育直播节目的作品性质判定问题涉及我国体育及其传播产业重大利益。由于邻接权无法满足版权保护诉求,产业界强烈呼吁将体育直播节目归入作品保护。但由于我国《著作权法》有关概念和规定存有争议和漏洞,法院在体育直播节目作品性质的司法判定上陷入两难。目前我国现行法并无明确的体育直播节目不能满足作品要求的法律依据,相关判决中的法律适用存有争议。解决难题的关键在于,法官在面对此类涉及产业重大利益的疑难案件时,应突破狭义的文义解释,通过广义法律解释方法以补救客观存在的法律漏洞。The judgement of the nature of live sports programme has related to the vital interests of the industry of sports organisations and their media rights holders in China.Because of the insufficient copyright protection,the relevant industry has strongly requested the copyrightability of live sports programme in judicial decision.Nevertheless,due to the ambiguous rules and the legal loophole under Copyright Law,the court is facing the dilemma of judicial judgment on the nature of live sports programme.The legal basis and the application of regulations under current copyright law are still in controversy when the relevant court negates the copyrightability of live sports programme recently.For the purpose of cutting the"Gordian knot",the judge shall pay equal attention on both semantic interpretation and ethical interpretation in a complicated trial which relates to the vital interests of the industry,and remedy the unavoidable legal loophole by applying the generalized legal interpretation rather than relying on the narrow sense of semantic interpretation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117