检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋佳宁 张容 Song Jia-ning;Zhang Rong
机构地区:[1]天津工业大学法学院
出 处:《苏州大学学报(法学版)》2019年第4期117-128,共12页Journal of Soochow University:Law Edition
基 金:中央宣传部委托项目“新时期核心人权公约在国内的司法适用问题研究”(项目编号:ZXBHRS2018001)阶段性成果
摘 要:国际人权公约的国内司法适用一直是理论界和实务界难以解决的问题。近年来部分国家出现的解释性适用理论以其特有的灵活性与良好的适应性成为解决上述问题的模式之一,起到了很好地缓解国内人权司法保障与国家履行国际人权公约义务之间矛盾的作用。以解释性适用理论缘起为视角,讨论其概念及具体方法,分析国际人权公约在我国国内司法适用的现状及存在障碍,通过比较该理论在域外国内司法适用中的作用及特点,探讨其在我国法院适用的合理性与可行性,并提出建议意见。The domestic judicial application of international human rights conventions has always been a problem that is difficult to solve in the theoretical and practical circles.In recent years,the interpretation of applicable theory in some countries has become one of the modes to solve the above problems with its unique flexibility and good adaptability.It has played a good role in alleviating the domestic human rights judicial guarantee and the state’s obligations to implement international human rights conventions’contradiction.From the perspective of the origin of the said theory,this essay discussed its concept and specific methods,analyzed the status quo and obstacles of the application of international human rights conventions in China,compared its role in the judicial application of foreign countries in the field,and explored its role in China,and made some recommendations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49