检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蓝纯杰 LAN Chun-jie(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学
出 处:《时代法学》2019年第6期57-65,共9页Presentday Law Science
摘 要:挪用艺术作品正引起版权争议,其对版权法的理念和司法实践都造成了冲击,法律群体与艺术群体对于挪用艺术观点不同,在司法实践中思想表达两分法难以适用,审判中的审美无区分主义不对作品艺术价值进行认定。基于版权法的理念、对技术发展的回应以及保护艺术家权益,版权法保护挪用艺术作品有合理性与必要性。挪用艺术作品难以适用我国现行《著作权法》中的合理使用抗辩,建议创设邻接权以保护挪用艺术作品,既能维护我国《著作权法》体系之和谐,也能合理地保护原作者与挪用艺术家的权益。The appropriation of art works are causing disputes over copyright,and also has caused a shock to the concept and judicial practice of copyright law.Legal groups and artistic groups have different views on the appropriation of art,so it is difficult to apply the dichotomy of thought expression in judicial practice,and it is difficult to determine the artistic value of works by aesthetic indistinguishability in trial.But based on the concept of copyright law,the response to technological development and the protection of artists rights and interests,it is reasonable and necessary for copyright law to protect the appropriation of art works.Under the copyright law of our country,it is difficult to apply the defense of reasonable use of appropriation of art works,so we should establish the neighboring rights to protect appropriation art works,which can not only maintain the copyright law system of our country,but also reasonably protect the rights and interests of original authors and misappropriation artists.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38