检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李建华 何松威 Li Jianhua;He Songwei
机构地区:[1]长春财经学院法学院,吉林长春130021 [2]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130021
出 处:《法学杂志》2019年第12期46-52,共7页Law Science Magazine
摘 要:知识产权客体理论具有明确的体系目的,既希望为论证知识产权的民事权利属性提供基础,又希望增强知识产权体系的内部关联性,但是知识产权理论的繁荣没有达到这种体系目的,这主要是因为知识产权客体理论具有根深蒂固的实体思维,忽视了知识产权客体的非物质性特征。通过反思知识产权客体的实体思维,权利思维下的知识产权客体具有重要的体系意义,揭示了知识产权客体的双重体系衔接作用。这不仅提供论证知识产权之民事权利属性的基础,区分了知识产权与其他民事权利,而且指明了论证知识产权体系的内部关联性的方法。The object theory of the intellectual property has a very clear system purpose, which not only hopes to provide the basis for the demonstration of the civil right attribute of intellectual property rights, but also hopes to enhance the internal correlation of the intellectual property system. However, the prosperity of intellectual property theories fails to achieve this purpose. it is mainly because the object theory of the intellectual property rights has deep-rooted substantive thinking, which intentionally or unintentionally ignores the fundamental feature of intellectual property rights, namely the immateriality of the intellectual property object. Through reflecting on the substantive thinking of the intellectual property object, the immateriality of the intellectual property object under the right thinking has important system significance, and reveals the dual system cohesion of the intellectual property object. It not only provides the basis for the demonstration of the civil right attribute of intellectual property rights, but also indicates the method for the demonstration of the internal correlation of the.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117