检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马庆钰[1] 谢菊[2] 李楠 Ma Qingyu;Xie Ju;Li Nan(Party School of the Central Committee of C.P.C,Beijing;Chongqing Academy of Governance,Chongqing;China University of Labor Relations,Beijing)
机构地区:[1]中央党校(国家行政学院 [2]重庆市委党校(重庆行政学院)社会和生态文明教研部 [3]中国劳动关系学院公共管理学院劳动与社会保障系
出 处:《经济社会体制比较》2019年第6期145-153,共9页Comparative Economic & Social Systems
摘 要:社会组织不仅体现人类生活的本质属性,而且对于社会服务和政策参与有重要意义。但作为第三部门,社会组织的价值释放程度可能不仅仅取决于自身因素。基于这一假设,文章从法团主义视角对中国与德国社会组织现象进行比较研究,通过事实和逻辑推导,初步勾勒出制度环境、法团主义类型、政府与社会组织关系和社会组织发展水平之间的因果链条。就中德两国而言,文章认为,一个国家的制度环境影响其法团主义类型,然后影响到其政府与社会组织的关系形态,最终影响其社会组织的发展水平。NPO not only has the essential attribute of human life, but also has important significance for social services and policy participation. However, as a third sector, NPO may depend more on their own conditions to release their value. Through a comparative study of NPO in China and Germany, this paper outlines the causal chain between institutional environments, the type of corporatism, the relationship between government and NPO, and the level of NPO development. As far as these two specimens are concerned, the paper holds that the institutional environment of a country affects its type of corporatism, the form of the relationship between the government and the NPO, and eventually the development level of the NPO and the direction of the implementation of the freedom of association.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3