比较研究与中国哲学学科基础问题  

Comparative Research and the Basic Issues of Chinese Philosophy

作　　者：尚文华[1] Shang Wenhua

机构地区：[1]山东社会科学院哲学所

出　　处：《社会科学》2019年第12期118-126,共9页Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“《天主实义》中的逻辑与儒学天命观新解研究”(项目编号:19CZX029)的阶段性成果

摘　　要："中国哲学"这一提法自出现以来一直争议不断,有关如何进行中西比较研究的讨论更是不绝于耳。从存在(或天命)与概念-逻辑这一双重结构出发,我们可以"界定"一种学科意义上的中国哲学,这一界定呈现了经典文本与现代解释之间的张力,及其所打开的比较空间。中西哲学解释体系的不同,导致出现"盲点-纠正式"和"自身-扩充式"两种比较研究的策略,对比这两种策略可知,中国哲学研究和中西哲学比较研究是在概念-逻辑基础上的对发生性和超越性的存在或天命的重新经历和言说,而重新经历和言说的基础则是自身最内在、最原初的生存经验或生存倾向,这正是中西哲学比较研究方法论的基础。"Chinese philosophy"has been controversial since its appearance,and the discussion on how to conduct comparative studies between China and the West is even more controversial.This paper attempts to define the Chinese philosophy as a discipline from the dual structure of Being(or Providence)and concept-logic,and furthermore,to explore the tension between classical text and its modern interpretation in this definition and the comparative space between them.By comparing the differences between Chinese and Western philosophical interpretation systems,this paper gives two strategies of comparative research:the"blind point-correction"and the"self-expansion".Finally,by analyzing the most intrinsic and original inclination of the existential experience,this paper indicates the basic methodological issues of the comparative study between Chinese and Western philosophy or even the philosophical research itself.These analyses show that the study of Chinese philosophy and the comparative study between Chinese and Western philosophy are the re-experience and speech of the occurrence and transcendence of Being or Providence on the basis of concept-logic,furthermore,the basis of re-experience and speech is the most intrinsic and original existential experience or the inclination of existence,and it is the basic methodology of the comparative research between Chinese and Western philosophy.

关 键 词：中国哲学 中西哲学比较 存在 天命 生存经验 

分 类 号：B1[哲学宗教—世界哲学]