检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:戴宁凰 郑中锋 李威[1] 陆波[1] 庄淮千 DAI Ninghuang;ZHENG Zhongfeng;LI Wei(Department of Thoracic Surgery,Suqian People’s Hospital of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Group,Suqian City,Jiangsu Province 223800)
出 处:《医学理论与实践》2019年第24期3945-3947,共3页The Journal of Medical Theory and Practice
摘 要:目的:[JP+2]分析单孔胸腔镜治疗自发性气胸合并肺大疱的效果,总结临床经验。方法:选取我科2015年1月—2019年6月48例自发性气胸合并肺大疱患者,依据手术方式分为单孔组和3孔组,每组24例。前者实施单孔胸腔镜下肺大疱切除术,后者实施传统3孔胸腔镜下肺大疱切除术。比较术中术后相关指标、疼痛评分、血清学指标。结果:单孔组术后引流量少于3孔组,术后拔除胸管时间早于3孔组,术后住院时间短于3孔组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组手术时间、术中出血量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。单孔组术后第1天、第5天肿瘤坏死因子-α、白细胞介素-6、白细胞介素-8水平均显著低于3孔组(P<0.05)。结论:与传统3孔法胸腔镜肺大疱切除术相比,单孔法治疗气胸合并肺大疱术后引流量更少,更早拔除胸管,住院时间更短,疼痛及炎症应激反应更轻,值得推广应用。[JP]Objective:To analyze the effect of single-port thoracoscopy in the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax complicated with pulmonary bullae and summarize clinical experience.Methods:From January 2015 to June 2019,48 patients with spontaneous pneumothorax complicated with pulmonary bullae were selected and divided into single-port group and three-ports group according to the operation method.There were 24 cases in each group.The former was treated with single-port thoracoscopic bullaectomy,while the latter was treated with traditional three-ports thoracoscopic bullaectomy.Relevant operation indicators,pain scores and serological indicators were compared.Results:The drainage volume in the single-port group was less than that in the three-ports group,the time of thoracic tube removal after operation was earlier than that of three-ports group,postoperative hospital stay was shorter than that of three-ports group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups(P>0.05).Postoperative pain in single-port group was less than that in three-ports group(P<0.05).The levels of TNF-α,IL-6 and IL-8 in the single-port group were significantly lower than those in the three-ports group on the first and fifth days after operation(P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with traditional three-ports thoracoscopic bullaectomy,single-port thoracoscopic bullaectomy has less drainage,earlier removal of thoracic tube,shorter hospitalization time and less pain,lighter Inflammatory stress response,which is worthy of popularization and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.134.110.4