拾取“遗忘物”法律性质研判  被引量:2

Study on Legal Nature of Picking up Forgotten Property

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:潘庸鲁 PAN Yonglu(Shanghai High People's Court,Shanghai 200031,China)

机构地区:[1]上海市高级人民法院

出  处:《河南警察学院学报》2019年第6期82-92,共11页Journal of Henan Police College

摘  要:遗忘物不同于遗失物,对它的认定不以限定于特定场所或有效管理场所为前提,且特定场所管理人对遗忘物也无安全保障义务,对其控制和占有仍应坚持具体、现实的占有意识和事实;若持有人在公共场所对财物不能实施有效占有,财物则有可能被认定为遗忘物。当然,有必要通过归纳遗忘物认定的标准以对办案形成具体指引,同时贯穿刑法谦抑和宽容之理念、坚持有利于被告人原则,并最终接受社会一般观念的审视。Being not equal to the lost property,the forgotten property is not judged on the premise of the specific places or effective management sites.Manager of specific places has no security obligation to forgotten property.And its possession should follow the principle of the specific and realistic consciousness and fact.If effective possession failed by the owner in public,it shall be considered as forgotten property potentially.To guide cases,it is necessary to summarize standards for the determination of the forgotten property.In addition,it should stick to the modest and restrained principle of the criminal law and the spirit of tolerance and the principle of benefit in favor of defendants under the scrutiny of the general ideas of society.

关 键 词:遗忘物 遗失物 安全保障义务 有效占有 判断标准 

分 类 号:D924.35[政治法律—刑法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象