检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡紫月 丁建民[1] 周燕[1] 郑茹瑜[1] 经翔[1] Hu Ziyue;Ding Jianmin;Zhou Yan;Zheng Ruyu;Jing Xiang(Department of Ultrasound,Third Central Hospital of Tianjin,Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease,Tianjin Key Laboratory of Artificial Cell,Artificial Cell Engineering Technology ResearchCenter of Public Health Ministry,Tianjin 300170,China)
机构地区:[1]天津市第三中心医院超声科天津市肝胆疾病研究所天津市人工细胞重点实验室卫生部人工细胞工程技术研究中心
出 处:《中国超声医学杂志》2019年第12期1103-1105,共3页Chinese Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨厚壁型胆囊癌超声造影(CEUS)对比增强CT(CECT)的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析厚壁型胆囊病变患者图像资料,比较CEUS和CECT对厚壁型胆囊癌的诊断效能。结果CEUS与CECT对诊断厚壁型胆囊癌的准确率分别为87.1%、79.0%。ROC曲线联合分析五种影像特征,当满足3种及以上特征为诊断标准时,其灵敏度、特异度及准确率分别为84.6%、93.1%、89.1%。结论CEUS对厚壁型胆囊癌具有良好诊断效能,二者影像特征的联合对其诊断效能更高,具有重要临床价值。Objective To comparison the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(CEUS)and enhanced CT(CECT)in the diagnosis of thick-wall gallbladder carcinoma.Methods The imaging data of patients with thick-walled gallbladder lesionswere retrospectively analyzed to compare the diagnostic efficacy of CEUS and CECT for thick-walled gallbladder carcinoma.Results The accuracy of CEUS and CECTin the diagnosis of thick-walled gallbladder cancer was 87.1%and 79.0%respectively.ROC curve was combined to analyze the five image features,the sensitivity,specificity and accuracy were 84.6%,93.1%and 89.1%,respectively,when three or more characteristics were met as diagnostic criteria.Conclusions CEUS had a good diagnostic effect,and the combination of the two imaging features is more effective in diagnosing thick-walled gallbladdercancer and had important clinical value.
分 类 号:R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R735.8[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158