逻辑与历史:两种货币分析方法的冲突和统一  

Logic and History:Conflict and Unification of the Two Methods of Monetary Analysis

作　　者：李秀辉 Li Xiu-hui(School of Economics and Management,Zhejiang Ocean University,Zhoushan Zhejiang 316022)

机构地区：[1]浙江海洋大学经济与管理学院

出　　处：《经济纵横》2019年第11期17-24,共8页Economic Review Journal

基　　金：浙江省省属高校基本科研业务费项目“马克思历史与逻辑统一视角下的货币理论批判研究”(编号:2019J00056);国家社会科学基金重大项目“货币制度史比较研究”(编号:18ZDA089)的成果

摘　　要：西方主流货币理论在分析方法上存在逻辑方法与历史方法的冲突,且偏重前者而忽视后者,以致形成"没有货币"的货币理论而难以解释现实和预测未来。西方主流货币理论有其抛弃历史方法的理由,但根本原因仍在于逻辑方法与历史方法的冲突。在比较两种分析方法特征的基础上,可借鉴马克思逻辑与历史相统一的货币分析思路,为现代货币理论的构建提供方法论基础。There is a conflict between logic and history in the analysis methods of the mainstream monetary theory,which emphasizes the former and neglects the latter,making it difficult to explain and predict the reality because of the absence of money in the theory.The mainstream monetary theory has its reasons for abandoning the historical method,but the fundamental reason is still the conflict between logical methods and historical methods.On the basis of comparing the characteristics of the two analytical methods,we can draw lessons from Marx’s historical and logical unification of monetary analysis ideas to provide a methodological basis for the construction of monetary theory.

关 键 词：货币分析 逻辑方法 历史方法 马克思 逻辑与历史相统一 

分 类 号：F015[经济管理—政治经济学]