检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张建人[1,2] 彭松黎 李光程 刘竹华[3] 凌辉[1,2] 刘佳怡 黄涛 甘义 ZHANG Jian-ren;PENG Song-li;LI Guang-cheng;LIU Zhu-hua;LING Hui;LIU Jia-yi;HUANG Tao;GAN Yi(Department of Psychology,Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410081,China;Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province,Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410082,China;Mental health center of General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University,Yinchuan 750004,China)
机构地区:[1]湖南师范大学教育科学学院心理学系,长沙410081 [2]湖南师范大学,认知与人类行为湖南省重点实验室,长沙410082 [3]宁夏医科大学总医院心理卫生中心,银川750004
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2019年第6期1161-1167,共7页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:2019年湖南省社会科学成果评审委员会项目“巴林特小组在社区柔性治理中的应用”(项目编号:XSP19YBZ158)资助
摘 要:目的:编制适用于从时间视角来考察的工作价值观量表,并进行信度和效度的检验。方法:基于前期对不同属代、职业被试的开放式访谈的内容分析结果,确定工作价值观的类目:自我发展、职业魅力、薪酬福利、地位威望、利他价值、社会关系、人际关系、家庭维护共8大类42子类,在此基础上初步编制工作价值观量表。结果:探索性因素分析结果表明,问卷可提取5个因子,分别是压力小、内在价值、社会地位、外在价值、家庭与生活。信度检验提示该问卷具有较好的内部一致性和重测稳定性。效度检验提示该量表具有较合理的结构和效标效度。结论:本研究编制的工作价值观量表结构清晰,具有较好的信度和效度,5因子既能很好地反映不同代际、不同生涯发展阶段员工的工作价值观全貌,又能体现他们之间的差异,可以作为从时间视角来评估工作价值观的工具。Objective: To develop a scale of work values suitable for time perspective, and to test its reliability and validity. Methods: Based on the content analysis of open interviews with different generations and occupational subjects, the categories of work values were determined: self-development, career charm, salary and welfare, status prestige, altruistic value, social relationship, interpersonal relationship and family maintenance. On this basis, the scale of work values was preliminarily compiled. Results: Exploratory factor analysis showed that the questionnaire extracted five factors, namely, low stress, intrinsic value, social status, external value, family and life. Reliability test showed that the questionnaire had good internal consistency and retest stability. The validity test showed that the scale had a reasonable structure and validity. Conclusion: The scale of work values developed in this study has a clear structure, good reliability and validity. Five factors can not only reflect the whole picture of work values of employees in different generations and different stages of career development, but also reflect the differences between them.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33