SF-6D量表不同国家和地区效用积分体系的比较  

A Comparison on the Short Form Six-dimension(SF-6D) Utility Tariff in Different Countries and Regions

作　　者：刘笑晗 李顺平 陈钢 LIU Xiao-han;LI Shun-ping;CHEN Gang(School of Health Care Management,Shandong University,NHC Key Laboratory of Health Economics and Policy Research(Shandong University),Shandong Important New Think Tank,Health Management and Policy Research Center,Shandong University,Jinan,250012,China;不详)

机构地区：[1]山东大学医药卫生管理学院,国家卫生健康委员会卫生经济与政策研究重点实验室(山东大学)山东大学卫生管理与政策研究中心,山东省重点新型智库,济南250012 [2]Australia Monash University Centre for Health Economics,Monash Business School Melbourne 3800

出　　处：《中国卫生经济》2019年第12期5-8,共4页Chinese Health Economics

基　　金：山东省自然科学基金项目（ZR2013GM023）

摘　　要：多属性效用量表已成为主要的健康效用值测量工具。尽管六维健康调查简表(SF-6D)在国内的应用日益增多,但各个国家不同的积分体系,影响到效用值的测量。为促进SF-6D量表在国内的进一步应用,文章简要梳理了当前各个国家和地区的SF-6D积分体系,包括描述系统的差异、积分体系构建过程和所用模型的比较,最后对各个国家和地区的SF-6D积分体系的局限和应用前景进行了展望,这将为国内开展经济学评价研究,尤其是效用值测量和成本-效用分析提供基础支持。The multi-attribute utility(MAU)instrument has become an important instrument for measuring health state utility(HSU).However,the calculation of HSU is affected because of different tariffs based on different countries.To promote the further application of SF-6D in China,this article briefly reviewed the SF-6D tariffs based on 8 countries and regions,including the differences between description systems,the survey process and the comparison of the models used.Finally,to summarize the limitation and future of the applications of SF-6D tariffs.The purpose of the study is to provide basic support for health economic evaluations,especially for health utility measurements and cost-utility analysis in China.

关 键 词：SF-6D量表 SF-6D积分体系 健康效用值 多属性效用量表 综述 

分 类 号：R1-9[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学] R-01