检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张双根[1] Zhang Shuanggen
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院
出 处:《中外法学》2019年第6期1552-1577,共26页Peking University Law Journal
摘 要:公司法学界关于股权让与构成的争议,源于对股权性质的不同认识,以及未能正确理解股权让与的制度功能。而在研究方法上,欠缺对实务操作尤其是股权让与交易实务的关注,也是造成理论争议的另一原因。在理清各层次的问题面向后,以意思主义来构造让与当事人间的股权让与要件,不仅契合其制度功能,符合股权属性的法教义学推论,更能兼顾股权交易实务的特殊需求。至于股东名册记载,仅是股权受让人向公司主张并行使股权的要件,并非实证法上股权让与的构成要件。The controversy over the composition of share transfer in the field of corporate law stems from different understandings of the nature of share and the failure to correctly understand the institutional functions of share transfer.In terms of research m ethods,the lack of attention to practical operations,especially share transfer and transaction practices,is another cause of theoretical controversy.After clarifying the aspects of problems at all levels,the use of Consensual Principle to construct the requirements of share transfer between the parties is not only in line with its institutional functions,but also in line with the legal dogmatics of inference of the attribute of share.It therefore can better balance the special needs of share trading practices.As for the recording of shareholders,it is only the condition that the transferee claims and exercises the stock right to the company,but not the constituent condition of share transfer in positive law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.176