检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董培海[1,2] 李伟 DONG Peihai;LI Wei(School of Tourism and Geography Science,Yunnan Normal University,Kunming 650500,China;School of Economics and Management,Baoshan University,Baoshan 678000,China;International College,Yunnan University,Kunming 650091,China)
机构地区:[1]云南师范大学旅游与地理科学学院,云南昆明650500 [2]保山学院经济管理学院,云南保山678000 [3]云南大学国际学院,云南昆明650091
出 处:《旅游科学》2019年第4期1-12,共12页Tourism Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“西部民族旅游地创意资本培育机制研究”(13XJY027);云南省地方高校联合专项研究面上项目“连片特困民族地区旅游扶贫绩效评价及其提升机制研究——以怒江大峡谷为例”(2018FH001-100)
摘 要:20世纪90年代以来,旅游哲学研究引起了国内研究者的广泛关注。就研究内容及其深度而言,国内研究并不逊色于国外。然而,在研究范式的选择上,国内外却存在较大差别。国内研究奉行“建构”的旅游知识生产方式,关注“旅游哲学”学科体系的宏大构建,但哲学本身所具有的反思和批判意识淡薄。相较而言,国外对旅游现象的哲学阐释肇始于对旅游本体的认知和对旅游知识生产的反思,学科特征淡化,主要以问题为导向,思辨和批判的意蕴浓厚,值得国内借鉴和学习。通过对旅游研究中引入哲学视角的基础进行剖析,本文梳理了国内外旅游研究中哲学议题的相关成果,并从本体论和认识论层面对国内旅游哲学研究的成果予以反思,以期为国内外研究者建立一个旅游研究中哲学议题的对话与交流平台,引发更多国内研究者对“旅游哲学”理论批判特质的深入思考。Since 1990s,the studies of tourism philosophy has attracted wide attention of scholars both at home and abroad.In terms of the content and depth of the studies,the domestic academic circles do not lag behind in many aspects.However,there are great differences in the choice of research paradigms.Domestic researches pursue the“constructive”mode of tourism knowledge production and stress the grand construction of the discipline system of“tourism philosophy”,while philosophy itself has a weak sense of reflection and criticism.In contrast,the philosophical interpretation of foreign tourism phenomena originates from the reflection of tourism phenomena ontology and tourism knowledge production,and the subject characteristics are weakened.It is mainly problem-oriented and has strong implications of reflection and criticism,which is especially worth learning at home.On the basis of an analysis of the philosophical perspective involved in tourism researches,this paper reviewed the relevant achievements of philosophical issues of tourism research at home and abroad,compared them from the ontological and epistemological levels,and then reflected on the philosophical perspective of domestic tourism researches.They strongly suggest that a platform for dialogue and exchange between Chinese and foreign philosophical issues of tourism research be established to trigger more scholars’thinking on the critical characteristics of“tourism philosophy”research theory.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.227.102.59