检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒋丽华[1] Jiang Lihua(School of Law of Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing,401120)
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学法学院
出 处:《档案与建设》2019年第10期17-21,共5页Archives & Construction
基 金:2018年司法部国家法治与法学理论研究部级科研项目“民事庭审录音录像制度研究”(项目编号:18SFB5010);西南政法大学学生科研创新项目“民事庭审录音录像制度研究”(项目编号:2018XZXS-018);2019年西南政法大学法学院科研创新项目“法院档案公开问题研究”(项目编号:FXY2019028)最终成果
摘 要:作为法院档案公开的一部分,我国台湾地区法庭录音录影档案主要通过光碟交付制度进行公开。此制度确立于2003年,十几年来历经多次修正。2016年最新修法确立了对于法庭录音录影光碟交付申请除审判公开例外情形均应许可的宽松标准。法庭录音录影光碟交付制度涉及当事人诉讼权保障、隐私权保护及司法公开之间的利益衡量,修法过程中交付肯定说和否定说交锋不断。由于文化同源,我国台湾地区较为完善的法庭录音录影光碟交付制度对于大陆地区具有诸多可借鉴之处。As part of the openness of court archives,the audio and video archives of Taiwan’s courts are mainly made public through the discs delivery system.This system of Audio and video recording discs in courts of Taiwan was established in 2003 and has been modified several times during more than ten years.The latest amendments in 2016 established loose standards for the delivery system of audio and video recording discs applications in addition to the publication of the trial.The court's audio and video recording discs delivery system involves the measurement of the interests of the parties'right to sue,the protection of privacy and the openness of the judiciary.The affirmative and negated deliveries in the course of amendments are constantly confronted.Due to cultural homology,the relatively perfect the audio and video recording discs delivery system for courts in the Taiwan region deserves reference from the mainland.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.28.161