检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:海伦·佩里维耶 雷雅娜·塞纳克 龚华燕(译) Helene Perivier;Rejane Senac
机构地区:[1]法国巴黎政治学院宏观经济研究中心 [2]巴黎政治学院政治研究中心 [3]法国国家科学研究中心 [4]不详
出 处:《国际社会科学杂志(中文版)》2019年第4期43-54,5,6,10,共15页International Social Science Journal(Chinese Edition)
摘 要:引言在整个20世纪,欧洲福利国家带来了新的权利以及财富的再分配,使减少经济和社会不平等成了持久而正义的“体面社会”(Spitz 2012)的保证。“将人从必需中解放出来,享有免于匮乏的自由”,使社会正义与经济繁荣联系在一起(Supiot 2010)。正如战后时期人们设想的那样,国家团结是与凯恩斯主义的经济方法伴随而来的:在危机时期,社会保护和再分配通过支持经济衰退期的需求而起到了稳定器的作用,从而防止经济活动的崩溃。The twenty-first century began with a global crisis that is both economic and political in nature. In this context, an approach based on demonstrating how equality policies and the struggle against various types of discriminations are ‘performing’has emerged. The approach is designed to show that priority must be given to implementation of the principle of equality,with ‘performance’measured in terms of a cost-benefit analysis from an economic and social perspective. We analyse public justification of contemporary policies on gender equality and the fight against discrimination to highlight the consequences of this approach.We look at the role of equality in market regulation in order to shed light on the complex links between economic development and social progress. We show that justifications of equality policies draw on a cost-benefit analysis which legitimises them in terms of the economic and social benefits expected. We conclude that the foundations of equality and social justice are weakened by the importance accorded to the supposed or imagined benefits of equality policies and anti-discrimination.Equality thus submitted to a demonstration of its performance is no longer a principle but rather an option dependent on such demonstration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.180.227