检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]韩国首尔成均馆大学公共管理系
出 处:《国际社会科学杂志(中文版)》2019年第4期103-120,7,12,共20页International Social Science Journal(Chinese Edition)
摘 要:引言近年来,世界各国在实现开放政府(open government)方面有两大趋势性途径。一种途径被认为是基于权利的变动,涉及与知情权(right to know)相关的正式制度安排,这些安排从数量上看不断增多,预计将对促进信息自由(FOI)发挥至关重要的作用。国家层面上的信息自由立法和国际机制,如联合国《世界人权宣言》第19条,能够促进信息获取(ATI)的自由(Hamilton and Ole Pors 2003)。This study examines the influence of legal arrangements(freedom of information legislation), technological advancements(e-government), and administrative capacity(government effectiveness) on the right to information with a cross-country view. To that end, it uses various global indicators. A regression-based analysis reveals that legal guarantees and e-government do not significantly influence the extent to which the right to information is realised. Freedom of information legislation can offer legal guarantees for the right to information;however, the outcomes in terms of the right to information have not yet been reached for many new adopters of the legislation. While the contribution of e-government to the right to information is also insignificant, a government’s administrative capacity is pivotal to achieving the right to information.
分 类 号:TP3[自动化与计算机技术—计算机科学与技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171