检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁旺然 YUAN Wangran(Intellectual Property School, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China)
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学知识产权学院
出 处:《山东科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2020年第1期48-55,共8页Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
摘 要:数字音频技术的进步催生了重混音乐的创作。作为一种新兴的创作方式,音乐重混仍处于著作权法的灰色地带。创作重混音乐需使用已有作品,但这种使用并不符合合理使用的情形,因此重混音乐人必须获得许可后方能进行合法创作。在现行许可制度下,重混音乐人和原作品版权人之间的权利义务不均衡,重混创作人负担过重的义务,这打击了重混音乐人进行创作的积极性。合理使用的四要素判断法以及知识共享协议虽然能在一定程度上促进重混音乐的发展,但同时有其固有缺陷。引入默示许可制度,将一部分义务转由原作品版权人负担,同时对原作品版权人的获酬权予以保障,由此可以使双方权利义务关系重获平衡,从根本上消除重混音乐发展所遭遇的法律障碍。Remixing music is a new way of creation which comes with the development of digital audio technology.However,as a new form of musical creativity,remixing music still remains in the margin of Copyright Law.Since remixing music has to combine with the elements of the existing works and it does not belong to the fair use,the remixer must obtain the license from the artist of the music that he uses.Under the current license system,the unbalanced rights and obligations between the remixer and the copywriter owner as well as the heavy obligations of the remixer frustrate the enthusiasm of the remixer.The fair use standard in American copyright law and the creative commons can be helpful to this problem but both of them have their own shortness.In order to remove legal obstacles to remixing music,we must introduce the implied license system which transforms some of the burden from the remixer to the copyright owner,and at the same time,the latter’s right of remuneration should be guaranteed.And thus the legal barriers in remixing music can be eradicated fundamentally and the balance can be achieved between the copyright owner and the remixer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62