检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋洋 SONG Yang(Law School of Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu Sichuan 610101,China)
机构地区:[1]四川师范大学法学院
出 处:《四川文理学院学报》2019年第6期37-41,共5页Sichuan University of Arts and Science Journal
摘 要:随着离婚率的不断攀升,夫妻忠诚协议越来越成为人们捍卫婚姻忠诚、维护自身权益的一大利器。然而,正如本文以30份裁判文书为样本的判案所显示那样,兹因法律规定空缺、案例指引缺乏、法官裁量权过大等原因所致,现实审判面临着夫妻忠诚协议定性不一、法律抑或道德义务存在争议、协议内容认可标准存在差异等突出困境。鉴于此,本文以夫妻忠实义务既是道德义务又是法律义务、夫妻忠诚协议是以婚姻关系为前提的特殊合同并要满足特殊生效要件为审判基准,重点提出三项应对之策,亦即:明确相关规范,实现于法有据;提倡协议公证,分担审查难度;统一裁判标准,提升法官素质。With the increasing divorce rate,loyalty agreement has become an important form for people to defend the loyalty of both parties and protect their own rights and interests.However,there is no uniform standard for the validity of loyalty agreement.Starting from the trial cases of loyalty agreement effectiveness,this paper analyzes the differences in the recognition of husband and wife loyalty agreement effectiveness in each case,the problems reflected and the reasons,and then carries out the analysis and discussion of--loyalty agreement effectiveness recognition.On the basis of fully proving that loyalty agreement is a special contract,this paper puts forward some Suggestions from the aspects of legislation and practice,so as to provide reference for the trial practice of loyalty agreement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.116