不同诉讼阶段适用不同犯罪构成理论探析  

An Analysis of Applying Different Theory of Criminal Constitution to Different Litigation Stage

作　　者：李永升[1] 吴泓佶 LI Yongsheng;WU Hongji(School of Law,Southwest University of Political Science&Law,Chongqing,401120,China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院

出　　处：《西南石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第6期68-75,共8页Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：犯罪构成理论是刑法理论的重要内容,对指导刑事司法起着重要作用。当前,我国犯罪构成理论的多元发展已成事实,主要存在着客观.主观体系、控诉·辩护体系、不法.有责体系,它们均有各自的特征。在不同的诉讼阶段适用不同的犯罪构成理论,不仅有利于犯罪构成理论与刑事司法实践的融合,也有利于犯罪构成理论自身的发展,使犯罪构成的争论在刑事领域细化。在立案侦查环节,客观·主观体系的运用可以节省司法资源,提高效率;在审查起诉和法庭审理环节,控诉·辩护体系的运用能为控辩双方明确证据调查的可能内容,增强对抗性;在法院判决阶段,不法.有责体系能条分缕析地论证被告被定罪处刑的严谨逻辑,增强法院的权威。The theory of criminal constitution is an important part of criminal law theory and plays an important role in guiding criminal justice.Currently,crime constitution theory in China has been on a road to diversified development with the objective vs.subjective system,accusation vs.defense system,illegal vs.accountable system,all of which have its own characteristics.Applying different criminal constitutional theories in different stages of litigation is not only conducive to the integration of the theory of criminal constitution and criminal justice practice,but also to the development of the theory itself,and to the refining of the argument on crime constitution in the criminal field.In the process of case investigation,the application of objective vs.subjective system can save judicial resources and improve efficiency;in the process of examination of prosecution and court trials,the application of the accusation vs.defense system can clarify the possible content of evidence investigation and enhance confrontation;at the judgment stage,the illegal vs.accountable system can demonstrate the rigorous logic of the defendant’s conviction and enhance the authority of the court.

关 键 词：刑事实务 诉讼阶段 犯罪构成 控诉 辩护 

分 类 号：DF611[政治法律—刑法学]