检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄俊[1] HUANG Jun(Jiangbin Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,Nanning,Guangxi 530021,China)
机构地区:[1]广西壮族自治区江滨医院,广西南宁530021
出 处:《大医生》2019年第14期40-41,共2页Doctor
摘 要:目的比较FAST和ROSIER量表对急诊脑卒中的诊治敏感效率。方法选取2017年3月至2019年4月广西壮族自治区江滨医院收治的202例疑似脑卒中患者,分别利用FAST评分量表及ROSIER评分量表对此202例患者进行筛查,并根据头颅CT及医院专科诊疗作为最终确诊,对比此两种量表的应用效果。结果ROSIER量表的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值均显著高于FAST量表(P<0.05)。结论在急诊脑卒中诊治中采用ROSIER量表进行评估效果较FAST量表更佳。Objective To study the sensitivity of FAST scales and ROSIER scales in the diagnosis and treatment of emergency stroke.Methods A total of 202 suspected stroke patients admitted to Jiangbin Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from March 2017 to April 2019 were selected for the study.All patients were screened by FAST scale and ROSIER scale,respectively.The final diagnosis was based on cranial CT and hospital specialist diagnosis and treatment.The application effect of these two scales was compared.Results The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of ROSIER were significantly higher than those of FAST(P<0.05).Conclusion ROSIER scale is better than FAST scale in the diagnosis and treatment of emergency stroke.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117