论摄制权的存废——对《著作权法》修订草案送审稿取消摄制权的讨论  

On Reserving or Abolishing Cinematographic Right: A Discussion on the Cancellation of Cinematographic Right in the Revised Draft of the Copyright Law

作　　者：刘华[1,2] 姚舜禹 

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学法学院 [2]华中师范大学知识产权研究所

出　　处：《知识产权》2019年第12期53-60,共8页Intellectual Property

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目：“知识产权导向下文化产业创造力激励制度研究”（13AFX022）资助

摘　　要：《著作权法》修订草案送审稿中将摄制权并入改编权的方案应予取消。摄制权与改编权是两种不同的演绎权,摄制权单列具有正当性及必要性。将改编权的外延和内涵扩大,无法囊括摄制权的内容和取代演绎权的地位,并不利于法律的科学化、体系化目标。摄制权关涉编剧和利益相关者的利益堆积体,即使编剧权益保护与法律的体系化追求产生冲突,后者也应让位于编剧权益保护的现实需求。The proposal to incorporate cinematographic right into adaptation right in the revised draft of the Copyright Law should be cancelled.Cinematographic right and adaptation right are two di fferent derivative rights.It is legitimate and necessary to list cinematographic right independently.Expanding the denotation and connotation of adaptation right neither cover the content of cinematographic right nor replace the status of derivative right,which is not conducive to the construction of scientific and systematic legal system.Cinematographic right represents the accumulated interests of screenwriters and stakeholders.Even if the protection of the screenwriters’rights con flicts with the pursuit of legal systematization,the latter should give way to the practical needs of protecting screenwriters’rights.

关 键 词：摄制权 改编权 演绎权 编剧权益保护 价值法学 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]