检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李远航 LI Yuan-hang(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200050,China)
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学国际法学院
出 处:《武汉船舶职业技术学院学报》2019年第4期126-129,共4页Journal of Wuhan Institute of Shipbuilding Technology
摘 要:船舶融资租赁行业在短时间内得到了快速发展,但法律并未明确规定融资租赁船舶能否进行扣押,由此引发了理论及实践中的诸多争议。本文比对了融资租赁船舶同光租船舶的异同,就融资租赁船舶的可扣押性从合法性及合理性两个层面进行了论证,并进一步分析了融资租赁船舶的不同交易形式特点,以探究其特殊扣押条件。本文认为融资租赁船舶扣押的合理性并非来自对光租船舶的参照,而在于其自身特殊性,针对当前部分交易模式下融资租赁船舶无法扣押的困境,建议在相应程序法或实体法中明确融资租赁船舶的可扣性。Financial ship leasing industry has developed rapidly in a short period of time, but the law does not clearly stipulate whether the ship can be seized, which leads to many disputes in theory and practice. This paper compares the similarities and differences between the financial charter ship and the bareboat charter ship, demonstrates the detainability of the financial charter ship from legality and rationality, and further analyzes the characteristics of different transaction forms of the financial charter ship, in order to explore its special detaining conditions.
关 键 词:融资租赁 船舶 扣押 《海事诉讼特别程序法》
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49