检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙培波 SUN Peibo(North China Electric Power Test and Research Institute Co.,Ltd.,Tianjin 300162,China)
出 处:《山东电力技术》2019年第12期65-71,共7页Shandong Electric Power
摘 要:以某电厂2×660 MW超临界机组为研究对象,对其常用的4种煤种进行分类,并以ASME PTC4—2013燃煤高位热值为计算基准,通过印尼煤、南非煤、澳洲煤的不同比例掺烧试验,得到各种混煤掺烧方案下的锅炉热效率,分析不同煤种、不同掺配比例下混煤掺烧方案的燃烧经济性。试验结果表明,基于燃料高位发热量,燃烧经济性从优到劣依次为:南非煤、澳洲煤混煤,澳洲煤、印度本地煤混煤,南非煤、澳洲煤、印尼煤混煤,南非煤、印度本地煤混煤,印尼煤、印度本地煤混煤。With 2×660 MW supercritical unit as the research object,the four commonly used coal types are classified.Based on the high calorific value of coal as-fired in ASME PTC 4-2013 as the calculation basis,the boiler thermal efficiency under various mixing coal burning schemes was obtained through mixing burning experiments of Indonesian coal,South African coal and Australian coal at different proportions.The combustion economy of mixed coal blending burning scheme with different coal types and different proportion is analyzed.The results show that,based on the high calorific value of the fuel,the combustion economy is from superior to inferior:South African coal,Australian coal mixed with coal,Australian coal mixed with Indian coal,South African coal mixed with Australian coal,Indonesian coal mixed with Indonesian coal.
关 键 词:超临界 高位热值 混煤掺烧 锅炉热效率 燃烧经济性
分 类 号:TM621[电气工程—电力系统及自动化]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7