福斯特重建马克思生态学的路径探析——以《马克思的生态学》为文本  

An Analysis on Foster’s Ways to Reconstruction of Marx’s Ecology——Taking Marx’s Ecology as the Text

作　　者：王伟[1,2] Wang Wei(Institute of Philosophy,Hebei Academy of Social Science,Shijiazhuang,Hebei 050051,China;School of Philosophy and Social Development Shandong University,Jinan,Shandong 250100,China)

机构地区：[1]河北省社会科学院哲学研究所 [2]山东大学哲学与社会发展学院

出　　处：《保定学院学报》2020年第1期8-12,48,共6页Journal of Baoding University

基　　金：河北省社会科学院重点课题“环境与制度关系研究——关于马克思自然概念研究的一点思考”(2017M01)

摘　　要：福斯特通过将其著作的名称由《马克思与生态学》改为《马克思的生态学》,从而使马克思与生态学的联系由外部偶然转化为内在必然。然而书名的改变只是表象,只有依靠理论的支撑,福斯特才能够走得更远。这种理论的支撑,除了福斯特本人对马克思著作的深刻了解外,还在于他对三个问题作出了颠覆性和创新性的理解。首先,重新理解旧唯物主义内涵,突出其理性的一面,将能动的方面还给旧唯物主义;其次,深度挖掘伊壁鸠鲁生态思想,使马克思思想中的生态成分合理化;最后,通过对弗兰西斯·培根的颠覆性解读,使“支配自然”从必然导致环境问题的固有认知中解放出来。正是通过上述努力,福斯特使其重建马克思生态学的理论诉求具备了思想基础和哲学范式。By changing his book’s name from Marx and Ecology to Marx’s Ecology,Foster makes the relationship between Marx and ecology from external to internal.What’s more,he strengthens such relationship by new understanding three questions below.Firstly,Foster re-understand the conception of Old Materialism to push the ration forward;secondly,he excavates deeply Epicurus on the ecology and rationalizes Marx’s view on the ecology;thirdly,by subversive reading on Francis Bacon,he emancipates the notion of“mastering nature”from the stereotyped impression which leads to environmental problems inevitably.It is through these efforts,Fostcer has his ideological basis and plilosophical paradigm to reconstruct Marx’s ecology.

关 键 词：《马克思的生态学》 旧唯物主义 伊壁鸠鲁 福斯特 弗兰西斯培根 

分 类 号：B089.1[哲学宗教—哲学理论]