以精细化而非一刀切的专利权穷竭制度促进我国经济发展——由美国最高法院对利盟案判决引发的思考  

Promote China’s Economic Development with a Refined,Not All-inclusive, Patent Exhaustion System——Reflections Caused by the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision on Lexmark

作　　者：张慧霞[1] 王舒露 Zhang Huixia;Wang Shulu(College of Humanities and Law Beijing University of Chemical Technology,Beijing 100029,China)

机构地区：[1]北京化工大学文法学院

出　　处：《北京化工大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第4期35-41,共7页Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：2017年5月,美国最高法院推翻了联邦巡回上诉法院对利盟案的判决,表明了其专利权绝对穷竭和国际穷竭的态度。在不同的经济发展阶段,美国各级法院针对不同产业的专利权穷竭的判决是不同的,绝对穷竭或相对穷竭的态度受到了竞争政策和产业政策的影响,而我国目前立法、司法在专利权穷竭上仍是“一刀切”的态度。经济全球化背景下,适应知识产权全球性的特点,应学习美国判例法的相关法律制度,借鉴其精细化的法律思维,这样才能促进我国法律的科学完善和经济的发展。In May 2017,the U.S.Supreme Court overturned the judgment of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals on the Lexmark case,demonstrating its absolute exhaustion of patents and international exhaustion.In fact,in different stages of economic development,the US courts at all levels have different judgments on patent exhaustion in different industries.The attitude of absolute exhaustion or relative exhaustion is affected by competition and industrial policies.Refined systems can promote economic development,but China爷s current legislative and judiciary is still a“one size fits all”in the exhaustion of patent rights.The global nature of intellectual property rights in the context of economic globalization requires us to study not only the legal system of the United States,but also its refined legal thinking,in order to benefit the scientific improvement of our laws and the role of economic promotion.

关 键 词：利盟案 专利权穷竭原则 产业经济 精细化的制度 

分 类 号：D971.2[政治法律—法学] DD913