滥用行政诉权行为的司法识别与规制——以102份申请履行法定职责案件判决书为分析样本  

Judicial Identification and Regulation of Abuse of Administrative Litigation Right: Using 102 judgments of cases applying for fulfilling statutory duties as analytical samples

作　　者：朱雨昕 Zhu Yuxin

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院

出　　处：《南海法学》2019年第4期70-82,共13页The South China Sea Law Journal

摘　　要：2015年立案登记制开始实施以来,当事人诉权受到更为充分保护的同时,滥用行政诉权的行为也逐步突显。实证研究发现,滥用诉权的判定理由多样,主要包括违反行政诉讼蕴含的内部程序、诉讼类型存在选择的空间时当事人选择不当和违反不同救济形式的制度衔接三种,每一类型下又存在特定的行为方式。从整体角度入手,结合形式诉求与根本目的之间的关系,可将滥用诉权的引发事由划分为三种:对处理结果不满、对其他事项不满和单纯的以诉讼为工具。根据各滥诉类型的不同特征,有针对性地寻求解决方案。首先,完善预防、处理、惩戒滥诉行为的相关措施;其次,深入推进多元化纠纷解决机制;最后,运用司法心理学,发挥裁判文书的教育引导作用。Since the implementation of the registration system in 2015,the litigation right has been more fully protected,while the abuse of administrative right of action has gradually become prominent.Empirical research finds that there are various reasons for judging abuse of litigation right,including violation of internal procedures contained in administrative litigation,improper choice of litigants when there is room for choice of litigation types and violation of the system convergence of different forms of relief,and there are specific behavior patterns in each type.The causes of abuse of litigation right can be divided into three categories:dissatisfaction with the results,dissatisfaction with other matters and simple using litigation as a tool.Ac⁃cording to the characteristics of different categories of abuse of litigation right,targeted solutions are sought.Firstly,we should improve the relevant measures to prevent,deal with and punish abuse of litigation right;secondly,we should further promote the diversified dispute resolution mechanism;finally,we should use judicial psychology to play the role of educational guid⁃ance of judicial documents.

关 键 词：滥用诉权 滥诉类型 行为模式 规制措施 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]