国际劳工组织专家委员会对“慰安妇”问题的审议和判定  

The ILO Committee of Experts’ Deliberation and Judgment of the “Comfort Women” Issue

作　　者：王玉强[1] Wang Yuqiang

机构地区：[1]吉林大学东北亚研究院日本研究所

出　　处：《日本侵华南京大屠杀研究》2019年第4期27-36,136,共11页Journal of Japanese Invasion of China and Nanjing Massacre

基　　金：南京大屠杀史与国际和平研究院课题“国际法学家委员会对‘慰安妇’问题国际化的推动作用”（18YJY019）;国家社科基金后期资助项目“联合国与‘慰安妇’问题研究”（18FSS020）;国家社会科学基金重大项目“日本对华精神侵略民间史料收集、整理与研究”（17ZDA206）的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：在法律层面上,“慰安妇”问题的解决体现为确定日本政府在“慰安妇”问题上的法律责任,并在此基础上对“慰安妇”受害者进行道歉和补偿。但日本政府一再宣称“慰安妇”问题通过《旧金山和约》以及与其他国家的协定已经解决,以此否认日本政府违反国际法以及需要对此承担法律责任。1996年以来,国际劳工组织专家委员会持续审议“慰安妇”问题,判定日本违反29号公约,并以此为基础劝告日本解决“慰安妇”受害者补偿问题。国际劳工组织专家委员会对“慰安妇”问题的持续审议和权威判定,对抗衡日本政府在“慰安妇”问题上的“法律解决论”以及“法律无责论”至关重要。The legal solution to“comfort women”issue is to confirm the legal responsibility of the Japanese government,on which the Japanese government apologize to and compensate those victims.However,the Japanese government repeatedly claimed that this issue had been resolved through the Treaty of San Francisco and agreements with other countries,therefore denied its violation of international law and the corresponding legal responsibility.Since 1996,the ILO Committee of Experts has continued to review the issue of“comfort women”and ruled that Japan violated Convention No.29.It also advised Japan to solve the issue of compensation for victims.The ongoing deliberation and authoritative judgment of the ILO Committee of Experts regarding the"comfort women"is crucial to counter Japanese government s claims of“Legal Settlement”and“Legal Irresponsibility”on this issue.

关 键 词：“慰安妇”问题 国际劳工组织 公约适用与建议专家委员会 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]