郭剑华七步推拿法与传统推拿法治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效比较  

作　　者：雷鸣[1] 王根 周杰[1] 王美元[1] 李沿江 

机构地区：[1]重庆市中医院康复科

出　　处：《实用中医药杂志》2019年第12期1537-1539,共3页Journal of Practical Traditional Chinese Medicine

摘　　要：目的:对比分析七步推拿法和传统推拿法治疗神经根型颈椎病对的临床症状、关节功能、生活质量等的影响。方法:60例按随机数字表法分为传统推拿组和七步推拿组各30例。传统推拿组用传统推拿法治疗,七步推拿组用七步推拿法治疗。用模拟视觉比例评分法测量上肢疼痛程度,《田中靖久症状量表》评分选择与神经根型颈椎病关系最为密切的自觉症状、临床检查和生活工作3个部分。结果:总有效率治疗组86.7%、对照组71.6%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后各项评分两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:七步推拿法改善眩晕、肩颈痛、头痛、日常生活及工作、心理及社会适应等效果更好,为治疗神经根型颈椎病安全有效的方法。Objective:To compare and analyze the effect of seven-step massage and traditional massage on the clinical symptoms, joint function and quality of life of nerve root cervical spondylosis. Method: 60 patients were divided into traditional massage group and seven-step massage group by the random number table method, with 30 cases in each group. The traditional massage group were treated with traditional massage while the seven-step massage group were treated with seven-step massage. The degree of pain in the upper limbs was measured by the simulated visual scale score. The scores of the Tanaka Yasuhisa Symptom Scale were selected from three parts: the subjective symptoms, clinical examination and work and life, which were most closely related to nerve root cervical spondylosis. Result: The total effective rate was 86.7% in the treatment group and 71.6% in the control group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05). There were significant differences in the scores between the two groups after treatment(P<0.05). Conclusion: The seven-step massage method has better effect on dizziness, shoulder and neck pain, headache, daily life and work, psychological and social adaptation, etc. It is a safe and effective method in treating nerve root cervical spondylosis.

关 键 词：神经根型颈椎病 七步推拿法 传统推拿法 对照治疗观察 

分 类 号：R244.181.55[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]