《九思》序/注非作于“六朝”辨——《楚辞章句》序/注研究之一  

Preface/Annotation of Jiu Si Written in “the Six Dynasties”? ——A study on the Preface/Annotation of Chu Ci Zhang Ju(1)

作　　者：岑贞霈 力之[1] CENG Zheng-pei;LI Zhi(College of Chinese Language and Literature,Guangxi Normal University,Guilin,541004,China)

机构地区：[1]广西师范大学文学院

出　　处：《广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2019年第6期100-107,共8页Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“《文选》五臣李善二家注论衡”(19BZW061)

摘　　要：词汇虽"最能反映其时代特征",然据此以断《九思》序/注中之某些词"未见两汉之世",并进而将之作为其成于"六朝"之证,则极富挑战性。就现存之甚小部分文献,即使能确证其无,也只是现存者而非当时之全部;同样情况,也出现在公认为王逸所作之《九思》中。而"先章句,后释词"之例不仅《九思注》有,《远游注》等亦然,故其纵然"与《章句》注释体例不符",亦不过为"例外"之一者;至于说《九思序》非王逸自序"口气",更多的恐只是说者之主观感觉而证明不了什么。《九思》序/注作于"六朝"说之种种理由,均动摇不了《九思》序/注为王逸自作说。Though vocabulary"can best tell the features of its times",it is very challenging to conclude that the preface/annotation of Jiu Si was made in the Six Dynasties,just according to the fact some words within"could not be available in the Western and Eastern Han Dynasties".Even if it is true,it is true partially to some few documents extant,not all of them at that time.The same happens to Jiu Si,generally recognized as Wang Yi’s work.The example of"Zhang Ju first,followed by Shi Ci"is cited not only in Ji Si Zhu,but also in Yuan You Zhu,a fact telling seemingly an inconsistency with the annotation style of Zhang Ju.But it is just one exception in fact.Someone’s claim that Jiu Si Xu was not complied by Wang Yi,seems to be groundless.Various proofs that the preface/annotation of Jiu Si was made in the Six Dynasties can never shake the truth that Wang Yi is the true compiler.

关 键 词：《楚辞章句》 《九思》序/注 王逸自作 六朝习语 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]