检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴冬 WU Dong(Institute of Modern Chinese History,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,Hubei)
机构地区:[1]华中师范大学历史文化学院
出 处:《攀枝花学院学报》2020年第1期81-87,共7页Journal of Panzhihua University
摘 要:新世纪之前,学界对宗教史的研究倾向于从思想文化史、社会史等路径解读。近年来,随着地方司法诉讼档案的陆续开放,对宗教史的研究开始从法制史角度进行了新的关注和探索,出现了一股对宗教史研究的法制史转向热潮。研究特点出现区域化与个案化的趋势,研究方法多采用量化史学与跨学科的方法,研究资料倾向于使用地方司法档案,研究内容分别从宗教法与宗教政策、宗教与政法关系、庙产问题等法制史视角对宗教史展开考察,重点剖析了宗教与国家、法律之间的复杂关系。Before the new century,the study of religious history in academia has a preference of interpreting in terms of history of ideology and culture and social history.In recent years,with the opening of local judicial litigation archives,researches on the history of religion began to attract new attention and exploration from the perspective of legal history,an upsurge emerges in the study of legal history which is characterized by regionalized and individualized researches.The research methods are mostly quantitative historiography and inter-disciplinary,and the research materials tend to use local judicial archives.The academia respectively investigates the religious history from the perspective of legal history such as religious law and policy、the relationship between religion and politics and law、the problem of temple property and so on which focuses on the complex relationship among religion,state and law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.162.63