检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:东方[1] Dong Fang(Library of Hengyang Normal University)
机构地区:[1]衡阳师范学院图书馆
出 处:《图书馆杂志》2019年第12期92-97,104,共7页Library Journal
摘 要:欧盟、美国主导形成了国际上较为完善的跨境数据流动法律规制体系,对全球商贸活动和经济增长具有较大意义。运用文献查阅和比较方法,对欧盟、美国跨境数据流动法律规制进行分析,考察其主要差异及相同之处。结论认为,欧盟、美国跨境数据流动法律规制的差异主要表现在规制模式、立法基础、价值取向三方面,但都努力维护跨境数据流动与经济利益之间的平衡。我国应发挥"中国智慧",积极应对跨境数据流动挑战。A relatively complete set of trans-border data flow laws and regulations have taken shape in European Union and U.S., which is of great significance for global business activities and economic growth. Using literature review and comparative analysis, the paper analyzes these laws and regulations, as well as their main differences and similarities. The conclusions are as follows: the differences mainly exist in patterns, legislative basis and value orientation;yet they both try to maintain the balance between the trans-border data flow and economic interests. China should play to the full the "Chinese wisdom" so as to actively greet the challenge of trans-border data flow.
关 键 词:跨境数据流动 《美欧安全港协议》 《欧美隐私盾协议》 数据主权 社会公共利益
分 类 号:D912.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.12.160.196